Time Value of Money *(Part II — skills)*
Concept
A dollar today is worth more than a dollar tomorrow. Today's dollar can be invested to earn a return, and inflation erodes the buying power of a future dollar. This single idea underpins compounding (growing money forward), discounting (valuing future money today), and almost every planning recommendation — from "start saving now" to "why a lump sum beats instalments."
Key rules & facts
- Compounding — you earn returns on the principal *and* on previously accumulated returns. The effect accelerates with time; the last years contribute the most growth.
- Future Value (FV) — what a sum today grows to when compounded forward: FV = PV × (1 + r)^n.
- Present Value (PV) — a future sum's worth today, found by discounting back: PV = FV ÷ (1 + r)^n. A higher rate or a longer horizon → a *lower* PV.
- Annuity — a stream of equal periodic payments. FV of an annuity accumulates regular savings; PV of an annuity values a stream of future income (e.g. a retirement payout).
- Rule of 72 — 72 ÷ annual return% ≈ years to double. At 6% → ~12 years; at 8% → ~9 years. Run it in reverse on inflation to see how fast prices double (3% → ~24 years).
- Inflation & real return — real return ≈ nominal return − inflation. "Safe" cash can quietly lose real value.
- Start early — because compounding rewards time, an early consistent saver frequently ends up ahead of a later, larger saver.
Formula toolkit — which to use when
| Formula | Expression | Use it when… |
|---|---|---|
| Future Value | FV = PV × (1 + r)^n | Growing one lump sum forward |
| Present Value | PV = FV ÷ (1 + r)^n | Discounting one future sum to today |
| Rule of 72 | Years to double = 72 ÷ r% | Quick doubling estimate (growth *or* inflation) |
| FV of an annuity | FV = PMT × [((1 + r)^n − 1) ÷ r] | Accumulating regular deposits |
| PV of an annuity | PV = PMT × [(1 − (1 + r)^-n) ÷ r] | Valuing a stream of future payments |
| Real return | ≈ nominal − inflation | Judging true purchasing-power growth |
Worked example — Future Value of a lump sum
Invest $10,000 at 6% for 3 years.
- Year 1: 10,000 × 1.06 = 10,600
- Year 2: 10,600 × 1.06 = 11,236
- Year 3: 11,236 × 1.06 = 11,910.16
So FV ≈ $11,910. Direct formula check: 10,000 × (1.06)^3 = 10,000 × 1.191016 = $11,910.16. Match.
Worked example — Present Value (discounting back)
You need $20,000 in 4 years; you can earn 5%. How much to set aside today?
- (1.05)^4 = 1.05 × 1.05 × 1.05 × 1.05 = 1.21550625
- PV = 20,000 ÷ 1.21550625 = $16,454 (approx.)
Set aside about $16,454 now — the extra ~$3,546 is what compounding supplies.
Worked example — Rule of 72
- At 8%: 72 ÷ 8 = 9 years to double. So $50,000 → ~$100,000 in ~9 years.
- Inflation at 3%: 72 ÷ 3 = 24 years for prices (and your dollar's cost) to double.
Worked example — the cost of ignoring inflation
A "4% return" with 3% inflation gives a real return ≈ 4 − 3 = 1%. On $100,000 that is only ~$1,000 of *real* gain, not $4,000. The nominal figure flatters the result.
Worked example — start-early advantage (FV of an annuity)
Save $3,000/year at 7% for 10 years:
FV = 3,000 × [((1.07)^10 − 1) ÷ 0.07].
- (1.07)^10 ≈ 1.967151
- (1.967151 − 1) ÷ 0.07 = 0.967151 ÷ 0.07 ≈ 13.8164
- FV ≈ 3,000 × 13.8164 ≈ $41,449
Those same deposits started earlier, then left to compound, would grow further with no extra contributions — that is why time beats size.
Exam angle
Mostly reasoning, not heavy math — "which sum is worth more today," a Rule-of-72 doubling estimate, "why start now?", and picking the right lens (grow forward vs discount back). Any arithmetic asked is short and clean.
⚠ The trap
Quoting a nominal return without netting off inflation (4% nominal at 3% inflation is only ~1% real). Also assuming a bigger *later* contribution always beats an earlier start — over long horizons the early start's extra compounding periods often win.
Takeaway
Compound it forward, discount it back — and never quote a return without netting off inflation.
Ready to test yourself on this?
Practise exam-style questions with the answer, explanation and the trap on every one.
Practise RES5 questions →