To boost upside, an issuer designs a note that returns only 75% of principal at maturity — cutting the fixed-income allocation by 25% to buy more derivatives. A client puts in S$20,000, but the linked derivative expires worthless. What does the client get back?
Reducing safety to gain upside means only 75% of principal is protected: 0.75 × S$20,000 = S$15,000, a S$5,000 (25%) loss. There is still downside protection, but not for 100% of principal. This illustrates the trade-off — a smaller fixed-income leg funds greater upside participation at the cost of partial capital exposure.
A 75%-protected note is not fully protected; the worthless derivative leg means the investor loses the unprotected 25%.
Practise more M9A Structured Products questions
Exam-style questions with worked answers, then full timed mocks. Free to start.
Build a daily practice habit — a few exam-style questions a day, with worked answers. Free to start.
Start practising →Original study material mapped to the public CMFAS M9A syllabus. Unofficial, not endorsed by MAS or SCI. Verify figures and rules against current guidance before relying on them.