An adviser proposes that a client surrender an existing endowment policy — incurring a surrender penalty — to buy a new plan that offers the same level of benefit but at a higher total cost. Under FAA-N16 and the switching guidelines, the adviser should:
Para 42 of FAA-N16 prohibits recommending a switch that is detrimental to the client. The Authority looks at factors such as whether the client suffers a penalty on terminating the original product and whether the replacement gives the same benefit at a higher cost — both present here, making the switch detrimental.
A signed acknowledgement, a bigger insurer, or a free-look period does not cure a switch that is detrimental on the cost/benefit test.
Practise more RES5 Conduct of Business & Disclosure questions
Exam-style questions with worked answers, then full timed mocks. Free to start.
Build a daily practice habit — a few exam-style questions a day, with worked answers. Free to start.
Start practising →Original study material mapped to the public CMFAS RES5 syllabus. Unofficial, not endorsed by MAS or SCI. Verify figures and rules against current guidance before relying on them.