Mr Tan, assistant to the CEO of an SGX-listed company, used trading accounts belonging to Mr Yap to buy the company's shares ahead of a takeover announcement and later to sell ahead of the withdrawal of the offer. Which of the following consequences followed? (a) A civil penalty on Mr Tan for insider trading under s.218. (b) A separate penalty on Mr Tan for employing a deceptive device under s.201, because the broker was misled into thinking the trades were for Mr Yap. (c) A penalty on Mr Yap for allowing his accounts to be used. (d) A term of imprisonment for Mr Tan.
In the Mr Tan case (2014) MAS used the civil penalty route in s.232: a civil penalty for insider trading under s.218(2)(a) and (b), a further penalty for deceiving the broker through the use of a third party's account (s.201), and a penalty on the account holder who permitted the use. No criminal prosecution or imprisonment followed.
Using someone else's account adds a s.201 deceptive-device contravention on top of insider trading.
Practise more RES 1A Market Conduct questions
Exam-style questions with worked answers, then full timed mocks. Free to start.
Build a daily practice habit — a few exam-style questions a day, with worked answers. Free to start.
Start practising →Original study material mapped to the public CMFAS RES 1A syllabus. Unofficial, not endorsed by MAS or IBF. Verify figures and rules against current guidance before relying on them.